3 Melody needs a better transition into the third paragraph (sentences 12-17) of her essay.
Which of the following could she add before sentence
12 to improve this transition?
A)
If struggling youngsters get the help they need,
it could benefit teachers, too.
B
As I think about a mentoring program, I have
many ideas on how it should work.
C)
In researching mentoring programs, I learned of
several promising results.
D)
Because I believe in the mentoring concept, I'd
like to see it at our school.

explanation:

sacrifice is a phenomenon that is largely lacking in modern society. in the era of consumer philosophy and selfish goals, people began to forget about disinterested motives that bring not material but moral satisfaction.

it is very good that the attention of schoolchildren and students is attracted to sacrifice through writing academic papers. the curriculum of educational institutions includes a wide variety of topics connected with this issue. young people express their views and share experiences regarding parental disinterested love, spiritual growth through sacrifice, functions of this phenomenon in family and social relations.

if you are on this page, for sure, you also have to perform a similar task. perhaps, you need to write a “sacrifice in sport” essay. pedagogues especially like to assign something like a “sacrifice of a teacher” essay so that students know what hard work is being done for the sake of their good. there can be many different options.

whatever the topic is, you do not have to worry. it is quite easy to write a quality essay if you have sufficient information and know the basic rules. in this article, the sacrifice is considered from different angles and points of view, so you will definitely learn a lot of useful information.

a source card is mage during research to tell the facts about the source one is using.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

what is the question ?