This essay assignment determines whether "How to Poison the Earth" or "Chronicles of Ice" is more effective in communicating the impact of industrial pollution and its effects on the natural world. Once again, underlying premises need to be established in the opening paragraph before the thesis statement is made. These premises are stated assumptions upon which, for the purpose of the opening paragraph and its position at the head of your essay composition, your comparison and thesis are based.
In order to state a thesis which is the result of making a comparison of how the poets tap into the reader's imagination through the senses, the individual way each poet does this must first be defined separately.

After your introductory lead-in sets general parameters of the topic and identifies titles and authors, define how each author argues in support of her point.

Deal with each essay in separate sentences and clusters of sentences, two or three sentences each.
Comparing what you have defined generates your thesis statement in direct response to the essay assignment prompt in the closing sentences of the paragraph.
Follow it up with a sentence or two expressing the impact on your own thinking about the environmental situation.

Essay assignment prompt:

Upon analyzing and comparing the authors' unique ways of arguing in support of their points, which of the arguments is more effective in reaching you, the reader? Explain why.

Your thesis statement is a direct response, in your own words, to the essay assignment prompt.

Post your opening paragraph with thesis statement, as instructed above, to receive instructor feedback.

Please follow this paragraph with your preliminary five-to-seven paragraph outline here to verify that you made one.

with mrs. linde, nora reveals her insensitivity and lack of shame about the forgery she committed. she implies that mrs. linde has obviously aged since they last met 10 years earlier, which accounts for nora’s inability to recognize her old friend. although nora seems sympathetic to mrs. linde’s plight, she can’t seem to control herself from boasting about her three children, her husband’s recent promotion, and how good she feels to finally have some money to spend. in a way, she seems to be flaunting her good fortune in front of mrs. linde who, deprived of all these benefits, has come to ask nora for . it is also through her interactions with mrs. linde that we realize something deeper lies under nora’s seemingly childish exterior. she reveals the secret of her forgery to mrs. linde and seems to see herself as quite resourceful for having done it.

in the company of dr. rank, nora is freer than she is with her own husband. she openly laughs with joy at knowing that all the other bank employees will be under her husband’s control. she offers dr. rank a macaroon, apparently forgetting that he knows she is forbidden to eat them. she then quickly covers for herself by claiming that mrs. linde brought them. nora seems much more assertive and free with these other characters, as well as unabashedly willing to scheme, lie, and justify her transgressions as altruistic.  

krogstad provides an interesting parallel to nora. like nora, he too is guilty of committing forgery, for which torvald condemns him and decides to fire him. although krogstad is a man and nora a woman, their crimes of forgery unite them. in fact, krogstad might represent what nora would be like if she were a man and were not strictly scrupulous like her husband is. for example, she tells mrs. linde that "a barrister's profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won't undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally torvald has never been willing to do that." perhaps nora would have delved into the unsavory, given how opposite she is to her husband. krogstad's is also the only harsh voice of reality that nora is forced to hear, and that is because he blackmails her for her regaining his job at the bank. finally, torvald’s reaction to krogstad’s forgery seems to foreshadow his harsh and cold reaction to nora’s forgery.

im sorry im not learning about this stuff right now.

i think the answer

d.“‘shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us, hand and foot? ’” (paragraph 2)

hope it

rhetoric is the art of effective, persuasive speaking or writing.