Which logical fallacy do theses sentences demonstrate?

Logical fallacy "D. Correlation proves causation" is the correct answer showed in the sentences.

Explanation:

In argumentation, a logical fallacy is an error in reasoning which makes argument invalid. In this case, the example shows the statistic fallacy "Correlation does not imply causation". This means that cause and effect can't be deduce just because of the relationship of two variables. The solely association between two events is not enough to explain which the causes are.

i would pick a. i think this is more of a personal question though.

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.