20 POINTS GIVING BRAINLIEST (You have 1185 points) Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are j3rks.
Conclusion: David is a j3rk
Which best identifies an error in the soundness of this argument?

A) It's possible that David is not among the group of people who like peanut butter and are j3rks.

B) The writer is stereotype David just because he likes peanut butter.

C) A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.

D) The writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why David is a j-rk.

Whenever we take information from another source – whether we use the information word for word or we put the information into our own words – we must use a(n) right after where the research occurs in the paper.

What is implied in this sentence from mark twain's "the £1,000,000 bank-note"? i was puzzled, and wanted to discuss the matter a little further, but they didn't; so i took my leave, feeling hurt and insulted to be made the butt of what was apparently some kind of a practical joke, and yet obliged to put up with it, not being in circumstances to resent affronts from rich and strong folk.

What theme is best revealed by this conflict? a.)with cooperation, crews can defeat the gods. b.)dangerous ocean travel claims many lives. c.)rest is required for all who work hard. d.)people must respect the wrath of the gods. read the excerpt from part 1 of the odyssey. now zeus the lord of cloud roused in the north a storm against the ships and driving veils of the squall moved down like night on land and sea. the bows went plunging at the gust; sails cracked and lashed outstrips in the big wind. we saw death in that fury, dropped the yards, unshipped the oars, and pulled for the nearest lee: then two long days and nights we lay offshore.