Read the following sentence, which needs revising, editing, and proofreading: Mikhail loved halloween best because it was fun and no pressure and expectations, plus, candy and dressing up!
Which revision below is most effective?
Out of all the Holidays, Mikhail loved Halloween best because it was fun and not pressured and full of expectations, plus,
there will be candy and dressing up!
O Mikhail loved Halloween best for the following reasons: fun; pressure and expectations, candy and dressing up!
Mikhail loves Halloween best out of all the holidays because it's all about fun. There's no pressure to pick out the perfect
O gift or cook the perfect meal, and no expectations that the day has to be emotional or meaningful. Plus, there are parties,
candy, and dressing up!
Mikhail loves Halloween. He loves the fun of it. He loves not having pressure and expectations. She loves candy and
dressing up!

What is written in the preamble to the constitution? a. a list of reasons why the constitution was written b. the consequences of and penalties for ignoring the constitution c. a list of new laws added to the constitution accompanied by detailed explanations d. a guide explaining how to interpret and navigate the constitution

"and these i address to all females that would be married, or are already so; not that i suppose their sex more faulty than the other, and most to want advice, for i assure [women], upon my honour, i believe the quite contrary; but the reason is, because i esteem them better disposed to receive and practice it, and therefore am willing to begin, where i may promise myself the best success." this statement from franklin's "rules and maxims for promoting matrimonial happiness" best demonstrates his use of criticism to argue his point his use of common sense to appeal to women his use of flattery to gain women's attention his use of facts to prove his point

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."