My grandfather likes to speak fondly, and with that twinkle in his eye, about "simpler" times. Television stations were just a handful; changing channels involved removing oneself from the couch to physically wrestle with knobs and "rabbit ears"--the antennae that stuck out of the
top of the TV. He conjures up images of the family gathering around a clunky television set to watch grainy images of a lunar landing, or the once-
yearly broadcast of a movie he can't believe I have never heard of.
But Grandpa gets a little more serious, more animated, when he speaks about what he believes has been lost in this age of technology. He
thinks we have lost the ability, the need-the luxury, perhaps-to reflect before we speak, before we disseminate knowledge, before we send our
ideas into cyberspace for the whole wide world to read. And I think there is some truth to what he says.
While it is true that information is immediate, and often unfiltered, it is also constantly being challenged.
People are less likely today to accept the version of events offered by a single newsman sitting behind a rectangular desk in a distant studio. Today,
people question what they hear, and search for answers themselves. People are part of the stories as they evolve. I see it as a dialogue: vibrant,
dynamic, exciting.

Please HELP I will give you a BRINALY STARS.

Question

Which sentence would make the best transition between paragraph 2 and 3?​