Ok there will be a part one and art two part one is the question and part two it the text. this is part one. Which type of organizational structure(s) made the most powerful contribution to the author’s argument? Would the blog post have been more or less powerful if she had not included the narrative and dialogue between her and her brother and had instead included each side of the argument without referring to her family’s “war”? (3-5 complete sentences with text evidence)

Which link would readers of this dictionary entry click if they wanted more information about the historical origins of the word language

Read the excerpt from "save the redwoods."another, one of the finest in the grove, more than three hundred feet high, was skinned alive to a height of one hundred and sixteen feet from the ground and the bark sent to london to show how fine and big that calaveras tree was—as sensible a scheme as skinning our great men would be to prove their greatness.which  best  describes how the excerpt appeals to readers’ emotions? the excerpt provides facts about the tree, which impresses readers’ scientific minds.the excerpt describes how the tree traveled to london, which excites the readers’ sense of adventure.the excerpt compares the tree to a person, which makes readers feel sympathetic toward the tree.the excerpt explains how to skin a tree, which makes readers feel awed at the height of the tree.

What do the sketches of 9/11 victims in "portraits of grief" achieve?