SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE Write an Editorial on the Events of chapters 24 and 25 as if you were the editor of The Maycomb Tribune.

REMEMBER: An editorial is not an obituary or article, It should take a side or state an opinion concerning the news of Tom Robinson's death and/or Mr. Underwood's editorial, and/or Bob' Ewell's response.

Because of what you're writing about, you will have to think like a citizen of Maycomb, so be creative in creating a character, but make sure you use the novel as example for what kind of people live there.

This should sound a bit like an essay, BUT it can be in either THIRD or FIRST person, it is your choice. You will however still be graded on proper writing techniques (complete sentences, spelling, organization of paragraphs, etc.)

Make sure that your Editorial is in the following format:

-300 words

-separated paragraphs

-formal language techniques

Which word best describes the author's tone in this excerpt from "that spot" by jack london? i don’t think much of stephen mackaye any more, though i used to swear by him. i know that in those days i loved him more than my own brother. if ever i meet stephen mackaye again, i shall not be responsible for my actions. it passes beyond me that a man with whom i shared food and blanket, and with whom i mushed over the chilcoot trail, should turn out the way he did. i always sized steve up as a square man, a kindly comrade, without an iota of anything vindictive or malicious in his nature. i shall never trust my judgment in men again. why, i nursed that man through typhoid fever; we starved together on the headwaters of the stewart; and he saved my life on the little salmon. and now, after the years we were together, all i can say of stephen mackaye is that he is the meanest man i ever knew. a. excited b. ironic c. indignant d. playful

4. at the conclusion of frankenstein, robert walton has an encounter with the monster, who arrives after victor frankenstein has died. perhaps surprisingly, the monster mourns his creator and expresses remorse over the fate that victor suffered. the monster pledges to destroy himself and then departs, disappearing as he goes further north. how does the monster’s behavior and attitude in this part of the novel affect the way readers view him? is he sympathetic? is he more hateful because it is only after victor has died that he relents? how does the change in the monster fit with the theme of duality in the novel?

Which description provides the best objective summary of the article in the passage?