1. What kind of evidence does Nash include to support his claims? Do you find it credible? 2. What evidence does Nash provide that suggests humans really are hurting other species' natural rights to self-realize? Do you find the evidence Nash provides convincing? 3. Supply other examples of the consequences of human actions on our planet that Nash doesn't discuss? 4. Does Nash discuss any benefits of civilization? If so, what are they? 5. What are some other future scenarios that Nash doesn't discuss? 6. What groups are likely to disagree with Nash's viewpoint? Why? 7. Are you persuaded that humans will have to reorient themselves in the future in order to achieve a more hamonious relationship with the natural world? Why or why not?

it creates a visual picture of the man.

it conveys what the scene sounds like.

it describes the actions of the boy.

it reveals the poet’s opinion of the characters.

it encourages readers to care for the characters.

we should all just get dogs.

obama was told in early july 2004 that he was chosen to deliver the address, and he largely wrote the speech himself, with later edits from the kerry presidential campaign.

i believe the answer is: b. mr. head had a long, tube-like face with a rounded open jaw and a short depressed nose.

this is because in the un-revised sentence it said that mr. heads face was long and tube-like, and he had a rounded open jaw. this is not a very grammatically correct because of how it seems to drag on with the and, replaced with, with, makes it sound more fluent in the description.