Hi everyone I have a introduction discussion board post to do (hate em) and I have to reply to a student, heres what the student says: Hello! everybody my name is ( not going to put their name). I am from Mexico and I am studying for becoming an architect. I am excited about this new semester at HCC, and wish everyone can reach your goals. it is nice to meet you. Can someone give me 3-4 sentences to reply to this? thank you.​

Answer and Explanation:

I think becoming an architect is very interesting, I hope you make it far in that career! Make sure to study hard but also take time to relax as to not stress the body. I think its also cool that your from Mexico, as I've never been there before (you can change that up if u want).

#teantrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.