1) How do the authors of both "Social Media Gives Consumers and Brands a Direct Connection" (Pro) and "How Social Media Influences Us to Buy" (Con) use the same type of evidence in order to support their position on the topic? 2) In your opinion, which author more successfully uses the sources to prove to readers that social media's power is a positive or negative thing? In other words: Which author supports their claim the best? Who makes the better argument? How do you know?

How does the conflict in this excerpt advance the plot? check all that apply. carew’s murder provides mr. utterson with a reason to search mr. hyde’s house and learn more about him. mr. hyde is found hiding in his home when mr. utterson and inspector newcomen search it. mr. utterson finds evidence on the victim that further ties mr. hyde to dr. jekyll. mr. utterson begins to dislike mr. hyde and becomes suspicious of his connection to dr. jekyll. inspector newcomen and mr. utterson find items that suggest mr. hyde has committed other crimes.