Which best explains why the delivery of William Faulkner's Nobel Prize speech does not support its rhetoric and purpose?
A. The purpose is to congratulate, but the delivery fails in its
missionn.
B. The language is too lofty and poetic for the purpose of the speech.
C. The manner in which he speaks does not match the confidence of
the message.
D. The southern accent makes it difficult for the listener to
understand.

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."

click on the people icon, search it

~courtney