Why is McDonald's better then burger-king 

It´s not, both are trash compared to Chick-Fil-A.

Explanation:

McDonald´s and Burger King are inferior in quality and service. In addition to that, both are the stereotypical US fast-food service that makes people fat all over the world. Chick-Fil-A is good even if it makes you fat because it is of a higher quality, high quality service and chicken. Unlike those burger joints, Chick-Fil-A brands itself as a sandwich joint. Begone you burger loving couch potato, go run please, and eat a salad.

the difference between an explicit and implicit meaning is that the explicit meaning of a poem is that the detail is exactly defined. nothing is left to interpretation. an implicit meaning is an implied meaning. kabir's poetry is both explicit and implicit in that it can be interpreted on different levels. the explicit meaning leaves nothing to interpretation while the implicit meaning leaves lots open to interpretation. an example of this is found in the poem "rumi and the spiritual lover". 

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest