In "the Most dangerous game" Does Rainsford's perspective on hunting shift throughout the story? Give evidence to support your answer.

In "The Most Dangerous Game", Rainsford is a dynamic character. The way he thinks about hunting changes while being hunted by Zaroff. Rainsford only experiences an external conflict in the story.

He does shift in change

Explanation: The reason why this happens is because he is a dynamic character, a character like this changes throughout the course of the story

the answer is both an appeal to ethos and logos (if that's what your question options were)

the word that best matches the meaning of the expression "went to the big ocean" is died.

the goldfish died, which is why the father looks at the children mournfully. the "big ocean" is the father's way of saying fish heaven. he could have just said that the goldfish died, but this way, the children imagine the fish in a bigger, better place instead of just picturing a dead fish.

explanation: