English, 10.06.2021 18:20 emileep13

Calista is writing an argumentative essay about curfews for minors. Which evidence best supports Calista's claim that implementing a curfew law in her town would yield positive results? A.
Since minors would be fined for violating a curfew, they will be motivated to come in early, reducing the risk of being involved in a dangerous situation that would typically happen late at night.
B.
When teens go home at a reasonable hour, parents feel more secure about their children, and law enforcement has much less work to do with fewer children out in the streets causing problems.
C.
While some towns have seen that the exemptions to curfew laws—such as teens traveling to and from work—cause minors to be out anyway, statistics suggest that the most dangerous time to be out is 11:00 p. m. to 6:00 a. m.
D.
Although some studies suggest that minors will ignore legal requirements concerning curfews, most cities with existing curfews have seen a reduction in crime as well as an improvement in teen sleep.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 16:20

It was extremely base of him to desert you in your time of need. ( change into exclamatory sentence)

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 16:30

Which statement best explains why shakespeare has cassius use the word fawn rather than a synonym such as flatter to describe his actions?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 23:00

Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme courtâ€™s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 23:30

Buck did not cry out. he did not check himself, but drove in upon spitz, shoulder to shoulder, so hard that he missed the throat. they rolled over and over in the powdery snow. spitz gained his feet almost as though he had not been overthrown, slashing buck down the shoulder and leaping clear. twice his teeth clipped together, like the steel jaws of a trap, as he backed away for better footing, with lean and lifting lips that writhed and snarled. read this passage. explain what the conflict shows about buck and spitz.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Calista is writing an argumentative essay about curfews for minors. Which evidence best supports Cal...

Questions