Which statement best analyzes the rebuttal? It is effective because it uses fair and unbiased logic to present a flaw in the counterclaim.
It is effective because it sets an authoritative tone incorporating strong reasoning.
It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.
It is ineffective because it does not acknowledge any part of the counterclaim

It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Explanation:

In the given claim, counterclaim, and rebuttal, the main issue discussed is that of allowing children to play video games. The claim made is that children become violent from playing violent games.

The counterclaim, on the other claim, presents that they are allowed to play any game they want "under adult supervision". The rebuttal then presents the idea that allowing children only gives them unnecessary authority.

The rebuttal presented is ineffective as it failed to provide any logical reasoning for opposing the counterclaim.

Thus, the correct answer is the third option.

it wants you to read whatever it gave you. then compare it to the others you read. you need to use textual evidence, and cite anything you do!

hope this !

~courtney

the narrator is a first person, participant one, who describes in the simple past tense important and difficult events in his earlier life. he also provides temporal markers as the month (january) and the time (12: 30 pm). finally the account of his experience is very detailed, to the extent that a participant narrator would talk the same way about his experiences. a good example of such detail is the mention of the “bovril ration” which historically was a native american food adopted by european explorers in arctic and antarctic regions due to its high level of calories.