1. Does it have a clear, concise thesis in the introductory paragraph? If yes, what is the thesis statement of the reviewer? 2. Is the summary of the book brief yet thoughtfully explained? In what paragraph did she summarize the book? 3. Is the thesis well-supported with specific examples and details from the book? 4. Does It conclude with a powerful statement that reaffirms the reviewer's thesis in an interesting way? 5. Does the review persuade readers to read or not read the book based on the reviewer's thesis, support, and critical analysis of the book? Why do you think so?​

Now pick a section from chapter 1 of the call of the wild in which buck is interacting with another character. imagine that section narrated in first person point of view from one of the character's perspective, and rewrite it in the space below, attempting to use a similar writing style as the original author. then, in a second paragraph, consider this: are you able to explore some of the same ideas and themes when viewing the situation from the character's first person point of view, as compared to when it is narrated from london's third-person limited point of view? explain. your response should be be about 150 words in total.

Which quotation best supports the authors’ claim and purpose?

Pronoun clearly shows what is being referred to at specific person place or thing