Write an essay to present an argument that either supports or opposes the decision to award a singer-songwriter the Nobel Prize in Literature. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and evidence that is relevant and sufficient. here's mine I'm pro:
Do you believe that artists and authors should get awards for something that they did not mean to get yet deserved? That is what happened with Bob Dylan, who won a literature award for his rock music. There are many reasons why this should have been good. That includes that music is a form of literature and that Dylan was already deemed worthy by the judges.
Bob Dylan is a famous singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist, though he is most widely known for his career in rock music. Before he started making rock music, he was an American folk singer. Dylan earned many awards throughout his music career. He is a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, the Nashville songwriter hall of Fame, and the Songwriters Hall of Fame. He got awarded the Nobel Prize in literature in 2016 as well. He earned the Nobel Prize for creating new poetic expressions within the American song tradition. It sparked many controversies, some saying actual writers deserved it, and others argued in Dylan's defense.
Bob Dylan's work was poetic yet musical -and it was meant to be like that! Music and literature are both beautiful forms of art, and they are even better when mixed. Think about rhymes, musicals, and operas, they are very poetic and musical. Bob Dylan was very poetic, he even wrote a few books himself, like Tarantula and The Lyrics: 1961–2012. Poets. org says “Mr. Dylan has often sprinkled literary allusions into his music and cited the influence of poetry on his lyrics, and has referenced Arthur Rimbaud, Paul Verlaine, and Ezra Pound“. His award in literature was no accident.
There is no mistake in the choice the Nobel Prize judges made. These are well-educated and experienced professionals in charge of the Nobel prize for literature. The judges know what they are doing, especially if they award people a prize this important. Bustle says "members of the Swedish Academy and other similar organizations, literature and linguistic professors, previous Noble Prize winners, and national leaders" are the ones who decide who win the Nobel Prizes. These are very credible judges.
It is for sure that the judges for the Noble prize winners are very credible and qualified people. It is also now known that Dylan was an author and put poetic writings in his songs on purpose. We can conclude that Bob Dylan deserved his prize.

What argument does thomas jefferson make in this excerpt from the declaration of independence? we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.-that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. a. b. c. the american colonists desire a more peaceful alliance with great britain but their british counterparts do not. the american colonists have a right to seek freedom from great britain due to the continued oppression of their basic rights. the american colonies could form a better government than the one established by great britain to govern them. the king of britain and the members of british parliament have little interest in the welfare of the colonies. od. e. the american colonies should have sufficient representation in british parliament if america and great britain are to coexist peacefully.

Create a well-crafted essay of 1-2 pages outlining a likely theory of king tutankhamun’s death at the age of nineteen. your goal is to convince peers your age that this is the most reasonable theory according to the evidence. incorporate the subjunctive and conditional moods within your writing. use the following rubric to guide your writing. remember to check your spelling (by using a spell checker and also against the original text) to ensure the proper spelling of names and places in king tut’s world. reminder: spell checkers are great, but they’re not always right. think about terms specific to egypt or even tutankhamun’s name. a spell checker won’t know if you’re spelling these correctly, so check with the reading to keep consistent. rubric criterion exceptional capable developing beginning points earned ideas & content main claim supporting details sources are cited clear, focused, interesting ideas with appropriate detail, sources are cited evident main idea with some support which may be general or limited, sources are mentioned main idea may be unclear; supporting detail is vague or off topic, some source information used central idea or theme is not stated; supporting detail may be nonexistent, no sources mentioned organization structure (claim/counterclaim) introduction conclusion strong organization; seamless paragraph transitions; effective and engaging intro and conclusion organization is appropriate but conventional; attempt at introduction and conclusion attempts at organization, inappropriate use of lists or bullets; introduction and conclusion are not developed no introduction or conclusion; no clear organizational framework or transitions voice personality sense of audience appropriate to audience; expressive, engaging, sincere voice is appropriate to topic, but inconsistent or dry voice may be inappropriate; writing may seem mechanical writer’s voice is inappropriate or nonexistent word choice precision effectiveness imagery broad range of descriptive words; creative examples, vivid details and images language is functional and appropriate; descriptions may lack detail or be overdone words may be correct but simplistic; no attempt at detail, description, or examples word choice is limited, words are often misused; supporting detail and examples are nonexistent sentence fluency rhythm, flow variety easy flow and rhythm; good variety in length and structure sentences are appropriate but lack variety and length awkward phrasing and structure, similar patterns and choppy language sentences are incomplete or difficult to follow, language is confusing conventions age appropriate spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar strong use of correct conventions; errors are few and minor most writing conventions correct; occasional high profile errors frequent errors; most do not interfere with readability frequent errors interfere with readability

Evaluate one of the speeches you heard about a plan to erect a statue honoring the pioneers. choose the speech you disagree with, and write a two- or three-paragraph rebuttal in the form of a letter to the editor. (apex english 11 sem 1)