subject
English, 23.07.2021 22:30 michellemonroe012305

Can someone makes this sound better or make me look smarter? GMO’s or Genetically Modified Organisms are living things that have purposely altered DNA to be more desirable to humans. The first instance of generic engineering was the domestication of corn in Mesoamerica, achieved by selective breeding to make ears of corn larger, and sweeter 9,000 years ago. Cotton, Hemp, Dogs, Cats, and other common organisms have all been genetically altered during their lives with humans prior to the first industrial revolution.
People who believe genetic engineering is good readily reference pre-industrial revolution GMOs that had unchallenged benefits; today genetic engineering works differently. The recent movement to reject GMOs often focuses on self-ish reasons ‘Bad for your body’ ‘Leads to more Allergies’. Modern genetic engineering decreases the costs of production at the expense of the product and the environment.

Current GMOs tests are thorough, spending 1-10 years waiting for approval in the United States. According to Inside Battelle “Testing includes nutritional analysis and protein analysis and characterization... to identify any new proteins created by the GM crop that could produce an allergic reaction or other adverse effect.” Thus proving that some GMOs are theoretically safe. For example Drought Tolerant Corn, DT Corn is a species of corn grown across the United States, for several reasons DT Corn in not safe for human consumption and is fed to animals, scientists say DT Corn isn’t safe for cattle either but since DT Corn is so cheap it is commonly fed to cattle anyways (Eldon et. al). Even though corn naturally pollinates through wind DT Corn is still grown next to fields corn that is meant to be sold to humans, once the DT Corn pollinated a field of Yellow Dent Corn that was processed and sold to customers who later got sick (Ted).

In conclusion, although genetically modified foods have greatly improved production I argue that genetically modified foods should not be encouraged because of their threat to the natural environment, questionable morals.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
The difference between point of view and choice of person in a story is that "person" is the literary name given to main characters in a story, and "point of view" is the perspective from which we view the story "person" is part of a term used to describe the type of narrator (as in first-person or third-person); "point of view" is how the antagonist understands the events of a story the terms are interchangeable; there is really no difference between them "point of view" refers to the perspective from which the story is told; "person" is part of a term used to describe a type of narrator (as in first-person or third-person)
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
According to auden’s “musée des beaux arts”, who understands human suffering
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which words in this excerpt from the count of monte cristo can be used as synonyms to determine the meaning of the word grotto? dant? s entered the second grotto. the second grotto was lower and more gloomy than the first; the air that could only enter by the newly formed opening had the mephitic smell dant? s was surprised not to find in the outer cavern. he waited in order to allow pure air to displace the foul atmosphere, and then went on. 1. air 2. opening 3. mephitic 4. cavern 5. pure 6. atmosphere
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:20
Nsilent spring rachel carson makes up a fictional story about what life in the united states will be like if we don't save the environment, whereas in "save the redwoods" john muir?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Can someone makes this sound better or make me look smarter? GMO’s or Genetically Modified Organism...
Questions
question
Biology, 02.12.2019 03:31
question
Computers and Technology, 02.12.2019 03:31
Questions on the website: 13722361