"Over the next 170 years, many clues to the expedition's grisly fate have been recovered. As described in "19 Facts About the Franklin Expedition, the Real-Life Inspiration for The Terror," these include gravesites on remote Arctic islands, Inuit stories of strange men trekking across the ice, and even the sunken wrecks of both ships. Many theories were proposed for the disaster, including disease, murder, and starvation. In recent years, most experts thought that the expedition had been poisoned by the lead used to seal the tin cans of food. (Mental Floss, 2018)" Long, Kat. "19 Facts About the Franklin Expedition, the Real-Life Inspiration for The Terror." Mental Floss, 26 Apr. 2018. mentalfloss. com/article/537632/facts-about-the- franklin-expedition-the-terror Is the website Mental Floss a credible source? Why or why not? O This source is credible because it was published recently.
0 This source is not credible because it describes unproven theories.
0 This source is credible because it is well written and contains no spelling or grammar errors.
O This source is not credible. Websites such as Mental Floss are not reviewed by experts.

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

it is c because i got it right on my test

can yo copy and paste the story? i don't know what to work with if i don't have anything.