What is the BEST piece of evidence to prove the age of the Page-Ladson site?
A. In 1997 for instants researchers found an archaeology sight in Chile with evidence of human activity dating back to 14,500 years ago. In 2002, 14,300 year old fossils of human feces were found in Oregon. B. It’s important because it adds another site to this very small list of well dated pre-Clovis sites, Jenkins said. We don’t find much evidence of these people because they weren’t very many of them. We’re looking for a very very few people in a huge huge haystack. C. The excavations at Page/ Ladson are not new. In the 1980s an 90s, another research team determined that the site was more than 14,000 years old. Their findings were disregarded by the archaeology Community. D. Do you need three things to prove the age of the site he said. First you need clear evidence of human activity, usually in the form of stone tools, Second these tools must be found in a solid place. Third these artifacts must be dated using a reliable dating method he said, At Page/Ladson we need all three.