1. Considering Meaning: Jarvie states in paragraph 5 that trigger warnings threaten “to define public discussion both online and off.” How does she
argument?
2. Identifying Writing Strategies: In paragraph 8, Jarvie notes that trigger
warnings have become the target of humor” in some publications. Why
do
you think she includes these details? How does this section help sup-
port her argument?
3. Reading Critically: In paragraph 12, Jarvie writes, “as a means of nav-
igating the Internet, or setting the tone for academic discussion, the
trigger warning is unhelpful.” What does she mean by “unhelpful”? How
does she support this position?

go to crash course lititure and go to seconed page and it shows a video about that

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)