Refer to the Newsela article "Should We Abolish the Electoral College?" The author of the PRO argument states that the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will correct the imbalance of voting power.

Which statement best explains how the author of the CON argument interprets the idea of National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?

It overturns what is written in the Constitution about adding amendments.

It could force states to support candidates that their own citizens did not choose.

It will make the popular vote less powerful than the Electoral College vote.

It goes against the basic idea of a representative government. please help

a lot

explanation:

answer: 1 goes to 3

2 goes to 4

3 goes to 2

4 goes to 1

explanation:

sentences vary by structure as well as by function. there are compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.

simple sentence

i like to read.

a simple sentence has one independent clause.

compound sentence

i like to read, and i also like to write.

a compound sentence includes more than one independent clause, connected by a coordinating conjunction (and, but, for, nor, or, so, or yet).

complex sentence

i prefer to read books that are bestsellers.

a complex sentence includes one independent clause and one or more dependent clauses. (a dependent clause is one that cannot stand alone.) types of dependent clauses include relative clauses (i kicked the boy who pinched me), adverb clauses (i am going home now because i have a curfew), and noun clauses (i don't know what to do next).

compound-complex sentence

although i prefer to read current bestsellers, i do like to read old agatha christie mysteries, and i also like some 20th-century science fiction.

compound-complex sentences take a bunch of clauses (multiple independent clauses, and one or more dependent clauses) and toss them together like a salad. although these sentences take practice to write in a grammatically correct fashion, they can hold a tremendous amount of meaning, and are common in academic writing.

b) the sentance would correctly look more like this: jerry's team manned the winning boat with a broken rudder.