How does the narrator of "History in the Making" develop the viewpoint that the Wright Brothers make history? A. by describing events leading to the Wright Brothers' making the first and longest recorded flight

B. by relating the story about how the Wright Brothers engage local community members to help them in their work

C. by explaining how the Wright Brothers' discover the ideal location to launch a wind-powered flying machine.

D. by emphasizing that the Wright Brothers use their experience working with bicycles to experiment with flight

Which is the correct answer?

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

argumentative i feel like this best match it but it could judgmental to

c.    

discover group member skills and assign roles