ASAP!!! Other people argue that players willingly trade their health for the money and fame that football might bring. They say football players view this as a risk worth taking. However, there would not be any money or fame if people did not watch football. If no one showed up to the stadiums or bought the merchandise, there would be no reason for these young men to play. There would be no reason for them to sacrifice their physical and mental health—and sometimes, their lives—for the sake of a sport.

Paragraph 3 argues that

A
Most football players think that it is worth it to put their health at risk; after all, football players make a lot of money and many become famous.

B
Football players do not get paid nearly enough to suffer such debilitating injuries; if they got paid more, it would offset the danger.

C
Since players get paid so much money to play, they are the ones who decide that it is worth it to risk injuring themselves.

D
Because fans provide the money and fame that lure players into this dangerous sport, fans are responsible for the injuries players suffer.

it is about the use of non animal tested cosmetics.

i dont think u can but if you need tell me what language you speak and i will like to you

diane: )

yes it did. that's been proven time and again. i used to be an elementary school teacher myself, and i worked with thousands of kids with cerebral palsy across the nation and in canada. what i observed was that children with dyslexia were struggling to read and learn. it was a serious issue that impacted teachers all over the country, but it was so often ignored and denied.

and children with disabilities – children who have learning disabilities – they got to spend a lot of time reading in a classroom.

i could not believe there was never any kind of conversation in my school about how to provide more opportunities for students with disabilities. the education system was still looking for ways to keep the pressure on children's teachers to improve their grades, that they have to be teachers who were in the grade for eight years, and they weren't even being evaluated.

so why weren't parents or guardians concerned about whether their kids were being by this system, if they could not see their kids in a classroom that they could improve? why couldn't you say, "i think you need to improve your reading skills," right? and they certainly believed it when i pointed it out to them. it doesn't matter if you said, "you need to go to an optometry class, or to a teacher's camp