mange the following sentences as directed in the brackets: 1. He said, "I am reading a book." (into indirect speech) 2. She said, "I can play the piano." (into indirect speech) 3. Nita said to me, "You have told me a lie." (into indirect speech) 4. Mr. Rai said, "Is she working here?" (into indirect speech) 5. Anju asked, "Why was he crying the day before?" (into indirect speech) 6. I said to him, "Sit down." (into indirect speech) 7. Surya said to me, "Don't write on the wall." (into indirect speech) 8. The driver said that he had seen a tiger. (into direct speech) 9. The teacher asked me what my name was. (into direct speech) 10. Gokarna said to her, "Stand up, please." (into indirect speech) 11. Prabina ordered me to close the window. (into direct speech) 2. "My brother broke it last night", said Nila. (into indirect speech) 3. My mother asked, "Where do you live?" (into indirect speech) 4. Jagat said that he cleaned the room. (into direct speech) 5. Her father said, "Don't make it dirty." (into indirect speech)

it is grammatically incorrect and is illegible to me and i can not answer it.

it was surely an odd creature that one made up by reading the historians first and the poets afterwards a worm winged like an eagle; the spirit of life and elegance and charm,   in a kitchen chopping up suet. but these creatures, monst'r however entertaining to the imagination, hast no existence in fact. what one might doth to bringeth h'r to life wast to bethink poetically and prosaically at one and the same moment,   thus keeping in toucheth with fact—that the lady is mrs martin, ag'd thirty-six, did dress in blue, wearing a black coxcomb and brown shoeth; but not losing sight of fiction eith'r—that the lady is a vessel in which all s'rts of spirits and f'rces art coursing and flashing p'rpetually. the moment, howev'r, yond one tries this method with the elizabethan mistress, one brancheth of illumination fails; one is did hold up by the scarcity of facts.   one knoweth nothing detailed, nothing p'rfectly true and substantial about h'r.   hist'ry scarcely mentions h'r.   and i did turn to professeth'r trevelyan again to seeth what hist'ry meanteth to that gent.   i hath found by looking at his chapt'r headings yond t meanteth.

what were the pronouns? did it use i, me, and my? if so, it was first person. if it had pronouns like you and your it was second person point of view. if it used he, she, and they, it was 3rd person point of view.