PLEASE HELP Choose one of the following pairs of poems and songs: “The Lady of Shalott” by Alfred Tennyson; song “The Lady of Shalott” by Loreena McKennitt “Because I Could Not Stop for Death” by Emily Dickinson; song “Because I Could not Stop” by Natalie Merchant “Promises Like Pie-Crust” by Christina Rossetti; song “Promises Like Pie-Crust” by Carla Bruni “The Two Trees” by William Butler Yeats; song “The Two Trees” by Loreena McKennitt Plan to read the text version of the poem and listen to the song version a few times to get a good feel for the rhythm of each of the two versions. Then, think about how it contributes to the feeling and meaning of the poem in both situations. Write a short essay (200–400 words) comparing the two versions of the poem, considering the following questions: How does the meter of the poem change, if at all, when it is presented in song form? Does the original poem have a meter that lends itself well to song lyrics? How, if at all, is the poem changed or presented differently as a song? Why might the artist have made changes to the poem? Does the poem take on a different meaning in song form than in poetic form? Structure your essay into an introduction, body, and conclusion. Make sure your essay focuses on a main idea, includes precise language to clarify ideas, and is written in a formal style. Use textual evidence, including scansion, to support your ideas.

what do you mean there are a lot of answers for that.

what are the choices?

being pathos, an appeal to emotions to persuade an audience, logos an appeal to that which seems to be logical and reasonable, and ethos, an appeal to authority or credibility, in henry´s speech, before the 2nd vrigina convention on march 23rd of 1775, there are a few features we could highlight.

first of all, there is a rethorical appeal to credibility. this is contained in the metaphor of being guided by onle lamp,the lamp of experience, which tries to demonstrate that he does know well: the british and he knows that the deployment of vessesl has no peaceful intentions. the speech itself appeals to reasonings, as he frequently ask questions such as

.."are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be called in to win back our love? " ..

or when he suggests: "i ask gentlemen sir, what means thismartial array if its purpose be not toforce us to submission? ".

and this couple of examples can show the purpose of the speech: to convince the convention that the war is necessary, it is something that has to be done, as the would be facing an unfair agression, so that the british cannot be trusted hence, the american are being treated misrespectfully and have been underestimated, and this is reinforced with ideas such as:

" petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the "