subject
English, 17.12.2021 02:40 almostnevercbbc

HURRY PLEAS!!! Raul felt that the group reviewing his essay didn’t understand what he was trying to say. How should he respond?

A He should address each point of confusion as it comes up during the review.

B He should revise his work during the peer review, and then share the revisions at the end of the review.

C He should write down the group’s points of confusion and refer to them when he revises his essay.

D He should take time during the peer review to explain his ideas more fully.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 13:30
Occurrences of major earthquakes are considered unusual, but minor tremors happen frequently. which word is an adjective?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
What do technical writers need to do when using an image?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:40
Read the passage from sugar changed the world. sugar is a taste we all want, a taste we all crave. people throughout the planet everywhere have been willing to do anything, anything at all, to get that touch of sweetness. we even know exactly how thrilling it was to taste sugar for the first time. when the lewis and clark expedition met up with the shoshone, who had little previous contact with old world products, sacagawea gave a tiny piece of sugar to a chief. he loved it, saying it was "the best thing he had ever tasted." sugar created a hunger, a need, which swept from one corner of the world to another, bringing the most terrible misery and destruction, but then, too, the most inspiring ideas of liberty. sugar changed the world. we begin that story with a man who could never know enough. how does the conclusion of the prologue support the authors’ purpose? select two options. it introduces the topic that will be addressed next. it provides information about the authors. it states why the topic is relevant to readers. it cites sources the authors used in the text. it explains how the authors came to study the subject.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
Read the excerpt from "object lesson, part 2." "no sign of the original envelope? " "no." "i found two boys with bills — in each case a single, too. david strager and joey buell. no envelope." louise's brows met. ellery glanced up at the clock. 9: 07. he strolled over to her. "don't show them you're worried. there's nothing to worry about. we have twenty-eight minutes." he raised his voice, smiling. which statement explains the inference ellery makes and why he makes it? he infers that miss carpenter thinks they are not going to find the thief because he sees her facial expression. he infers that it will take twenty-eight more minutes to find the missing money because that is all the time he has. he infers that the original envelope will not be found because neither david strager nor joey buell has it. he infers that david strager and joey buell took the money because they each have a dollar bill.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
HURRY PLEAS!!! Raul felt that the group reviewing his essay didn’t understand what he was trying t...
Questions
question
Geography, 20.01.2022 21:10
question
Mathematics, 20.01.2022 21:10
question
Chemistry, 20.01.2022 21:10
question
SAT, 20.01.2022 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722361