In the climax of the novel, the Giver and Jonas formulate a plan to have Jonas escape, thereby flooding everyone in the community with memories; it is also decided that the Giver would stay behind to help the people of the community process their new feelings and experiences. Did Jonas and the Giver have a right to change their community in this way? Why or why not? Make an argument, and support it with evidence from the text. If possible, bring in examples from history and current events to strengthen your argument. Write your response in the box below.

Hurry i'll give 20 pts and a to whoever will comment first hurry no coying compares how both dickinson and shelley use form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias".

Which best describes the tone in these lines "the fish"

Match the author with the description a. ernest hemingway b. john steinbeck c. robert frost d. langston hughes (1) summers spent in pacific grove, california influenced the symbolism in his literature (2) his poetry includes simple, direct language. many are dramatic monologues written in free verse are about life on new england farms (3) the mood and tone of his literature is largely shaped by his experience as a soldier in world war 1 (4) his poetry and short stories include dialect and colloquialisms which gives his primarily african american characters distinctive voices