Montresor acts like a judge, jury, and executioner of Fortunato. Is there any crime/offense that Fortunato could have done unwittingly committed that would make Montresor's rage seem reasonable to you? D o you think individuals are ever justified in taking justice into their own hands? Explain your thoughts.

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).

a) a master's degree

hope it

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.

hello!

unfortunately i cannot answer your question because there is no question.

to get a fast reply and accurate results, re-post (or edit) the question to add a question.

sorry!