1. What does Romeo mean in the following lines (PDF page 1132)? Explain whether he thoughtfully considers his options or plunges immediately into action. Well, Juliet, I will lie with thee tonight. /Let's see for means. O mischief, thou art swift/ To enter in the thoughts of desperate men! (5.1.34-36) 2. Explain what you learn about the friar's new plan in this soliloquy in 5.2.23-29 (PDF page 1134). Why is it essential that the friar reach Juliet before Romeo does? I

alright, so here, the author clearly thinks that flooding the canyon was a bad idea and is showing bias against it.

you didn't finish the sentence , how am i gonna you if you didn't finish the sentence

as marlow travels down the river towards kurtz's inner station, their steamboat is attacked by african natives. interestingly, marlow notices that the natives are only shooting small arrows the size of twigs at the steamboat in an attempt to scare them away and halt their journey.

explanation:

biographical remarks present the shifting perception and re-interpretation of figures projected by the authors, or by the society represented by the authors. the portrayals in biographical accounts thus reflect the turning view-of-value in course of history. this paper particularly explores the ways in which “heretical” figures are represented in their biographical accounts, focusing on arabic zindīq poets who flourished in the 2nd century a.h. and are known for their extreme or heretic behavior. it will be discussed that the marks of their heretical deeds are presented in different ways, and the actuality of their activity, such as the association with the early theological thinkers (or mutakallimūn in arabic), is occasionally replaced by more narrativized and unrealistic anecdotes in later sources, the tales being reproduced to underscore the value of poets such as humor or quick-wittedness. the anecdotes also can highlight the qualities of their opponents who appear as their refuters. the chronological tracing of their biographical information from multiple sources reveals the fluctuating value of discourses of “heresy,” mirroring the turning religious reality and the imagined quality of the figures lived in the early period. the paper eventually aims to historically contextualize the functions of “speaking-about-heretics” as a subject of narratives, which works as a tool for writers to express manifold contemporar