When mike adjusted his bicycle, i thought i was watching a chess game. he would stare at a part for a while before he acted. then we would wait for his opponent's response. for example, he stared for ten minutes before tightening the rear sprockets. then he rode the bike for a minute, analyzing the change in the bike's performance. at first, i thought he was too careful. now, i realize he didn't want the bicycle to become his waterloo. which is a true statement about the passage? it contains technical language but no analogy or allusion. it contains an analogy, an allusion, and technical language. it contains an analogy and technical language but no allusion. it contains an allusion and technical language but no analogy.

Im quite certain its the last one. but im not certain. sorry 

C. it contains an analogy and technical language but no allusion.i am 100% sure the story contains an analogy and no allusion, c is the only answer that goes along with an analogy and no allusion. the story is comparing mike adjusting his bicycle to a chess game (analogy).  the story doesn't contain any allusions since it doesn't mention anything about literature, mythology, history, or religious books. here are some definitions of what it means: analogy: a comparison of two things that is more complex than a simile or metaphor. its pretty much like a comparison.allusion: an indirect reference to something or someone that is expected to be recognized. an example could be “good job building that go-kart. that was a herculean task.”