Can you guys rate this for me based of this ? i love animals so much. i know that animals love humans, so why do people want to ban the ownership of pets? i don’t get it. the first reason i should be able to own a pet is that i love animals. my family loves having a pet. our dog is like a part of the family. my parents take care of her and take her to the doctor just like they do with me. my mom says, “i don’t know what i would do without little josie! ” i think that people should own pets because they are . my friend just told me about a neighbor whose pet parrot woke her up in the middle of the night when there was a fire. it saved her life. what a lucky person to own a parrot. honestly, what would we do without our pets? why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved: claim support conclusion clincher point of view transitions(does this look good so far? )this is an ineffective argument that needs to be modified to advanced standards that will leave others wanting a pet instead of opinions that make others feel puzzled and worried about owning a pet. this text is a mess, it lacks a lot of information and instead contains a whole lot of opinions with downgraded vocabulary leaving other writers to cry at night. the argument essay doesn't even explicit in why they're or loving animals. this text deprives a lot of facts and sources in the sense that the claim in this argument is mostly opinions, it uses a first point perspective instead of a third point of view in the text which is a major flaw. this text has no transition, you don't know when the sentence is gonna begin, continue, or end. finally, the argument gives no facts or inspirations to those who are interested in getting a pet, people may be mistaken of getting a tiger thinking its a good pet when it can potentially kill you in the end.