Which evidence from the text "lake titicaca" by miguel ángel asturias supports the inference that lake titicaca's waters must have special powers? "waves of gigantic, seamless mass from the cretaceous that become, at the height of the american world, the fairest crown of water: titicaca." "mineral water. other american lakes have vegetable waters. the sun knows it. and it is not a heavenly body, but a foundry in the west." "water in which the armor of the incan empire’s conquistadors has not rusted. and it has been entombed already for centuries in its profound vase." "i saw, as the sun was setting, the conquistadors’ steel shadows sink in search of the city of gold, hidden by the waters of this andean sweet-lake sea."

The evidence from the text "Lake Titicaca" by Miguel Ángel Asturias which  supports the inference that Lake Titicaca's waters must have special powers is:

According to the complete text, we can see that the author is talking about the Lake Titicaca and how special it is. He uses  the supernatural to explain why the vase has not been rusted after many years.

As a result of this, we can see that there is a connection between the water in the armor of the Inca empire's conquistador which have remained the same for many centuries without any apparent damage or rust.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C

Read more here:

link

"Water in which the armour of the Incan empire’s conquistadors has not rusted. And it has been entombed already for centuries in its profound vase."

Asturias is describing Lake Titicaca, a body of water located between Peru and Bolivia. He claims that the armours of conquistadores can be found there, but that these have not rusted, even though they have been in the lake for centuries. This would be extremely unusual as metal normally rusts when in contact with water. If this claim were true, it would indicate that Lake Titicaca has special powers.

samuel gompers was an extremely important person in the american labor movement, being him an employee all his life he devoted himself to fight for the rights of his pairs, he believed they all had the right to have better thing and that they all were working for them but the factory workers were greedy, ambitions and socialist people for him who he didn't have a good concept of.

he gave so many speeches and led so many strikes and protest to fight for equality which he considered employers didn't want to accept, so he had an absolutely negative opinion of them.

the whisper is the answer, hope this : )