What does the interaction between the hunters reveal about zaroff’s attitude toward rainsford? question 6 options: he believes rainsford's views of life and death are insincere. he thinks of rainsford as a worthy opponent. he views rainsford's moral stance as misguided and uninformed. he finds what rainsford says to be humorous.

The story questions the superiority of man over animal. Zaroff and Rainsford's opinion towards each other is in animal-prey framework which they view each other in this context. Zaroff becomes bored of preying for the animals and instead of that he captures humans. The struggle of captured people makes Zaroff joyful and he makes Rainsford to join the challenge. After joining the game the latter becomes much dangerous version of Zaroff. The morality and the ethics of story at this point is put into question. The correct answer is the third option -  Zaroff views Rainsford's moral stance as misguided and uninformed.

hey there

use of language is very important in order to write in a good way. each literary genre has its different exploitation of language and, therefore, many differences and similarities can emerge. shakespeare's work (romeo and juliet) is a sample of a drama. its language is full of dialogue to describe the beauty of first love in people; everything it's pink color. it briefly describes fictional scenes and situations. on the other hand, the calypso borealis, by john muirs, it's narrative essay: its language is full of descriptions to describe an experience, a real experience. hyperbole is not used as in drama genre. he falls in love with discovering a real place and his direct feelings.

hope this !

f yes, , mark brainliest : )

have a good night.

- "chilles is sad and angry because hector, the trojan leader, killed his best friend patroclus. he seems angry with himself because he didn't or protect patroclus against the trojans."