People could easily preserve their forest habitat by switching to cloth towels instead of paper towels. which research question does this reason best support? a. what is the primary diet of endangered animals in this habitat? b. what is the cost of using cloth towels vs. paper towels? c. how much forest is being cut down for use as paper towels? d. are there any other suitable habitats to which these animals can be relocated?

The research question the reason best supports is the following one:

C. How much forest is being cut down for use as paper towels?

Explanation:

The reason shows one of the ways in which people could preserve their forest habitat: by switching to cloth towels instead of paper towels. It implies the reason expresses concern about what has been going on with forest habitats, and it aims at helping people find a way to preserve them. Therefore, the research question "How much forest is being cut down for use as paper towels?" is the one the reason best supports, since the reason shows an alternative to paper towels, which lead forest to being cut down: cloth towels.

answer: to inform

explanation: the red death is an exciting passage, but also in some ways scary, so it is not to amuse. the red death is far in the past, so it is not to warn.

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )