Which of the following statements is a fallacy of logos? ( answer is not b ) a. a person should be quiet in hospital hallways. this is a hospital hallway; i should be quiet. b. an injured dog may whine. my dg fluffy is whining; fluffy may be injured. c. this piece of furniture is a chair. this chair is soft; all chairs are soft. d. inductive reasoning begins with one example. counter examples may exist; inductive reasoning is unreliable.

C. This piece of furniture is a chair. This chair is soft; all chairs are soft.

Explanation:

In a fallacy of logos, you will encounter something invalid, insufficient or disconnected between the arguments given to arrive at a conclusion. In this case, there is a disconnection between the outcome "all chairs are soft" and the argument "this piece of furniture is a chair".

The conclusion doesn´t follow logically what is preceded by the arguments.

I hope this answer helps you.

ok so like i went to wiki and looked up the (constitution x new "hammystan")and it showed me the picture it highlights new hampshire and says first and second session and than it says that they hit up the u.s and was like "ey dude that paper u sent us was adopted it bro thx" xd syays it all on wiki/the pic

i dont really like reading so i guess other people might not like reading either so   imma put the answer in bold italics