Me 1. what are the two antonyms in the following proverb? "there shall no evil happen to the just: but the wicked shall be filled with mischief." (proverbs 12: 21) 2. what are the two antonyms in the following proverb? look for a set other than rule and tribute. "the hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute." (proverbs 12: 24) 3. what are the two antonyms in the following proverb? "the righteous is more excellent than his neighbour: but the way of the wicked seduceth them." (proverbs 12: 26) 4. what are the two antonyms in the following proverb? look for a set other than nothing and fat. "the soul of the sluggard desireth, and hath nothing: but the soul of the diligent shall be made fat." (proverbs 13: 4) 5. what are the two antonyms in the following proverb? look for a set other than nothing and riches. "there is that maketh himself rich, yet hath nothing: there is that maketh himself poor, yet hath great riches." (proverbs 13: 7)

An antonym is a word that is opposite in meaning to another word, in the first proverb the antonyms are just and wicked, just means a rightful and good person and wicked is a person who is evil or morally wrong. In the second proverb the antonyms are diligent and slothful, a diligent person is someone who cares about their duties, a slothful person is someone who is lazy. In the third proverb the antonyms are righteous and wicked, righteous is very good, morally correct and wicked means evil. In the fourth proverb the antonyms are sluggard and diligent, this is similar to the antonyms of the second proverb, sluggard means lazy. In the last proverb the antonyms are rich and poor, meaning a person who has a lot of money and a person who doesn't have any, respectively.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

d

explanation:

i remember this its d