How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? a) the arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized b) in the dissent, the majority opinion itself is used as evidence c) notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's argument. d) the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support.

The difference is that in dissent, the majority opinion is used as evidence, as shown in option B.

We can arrive at this answer because:

When there are cases of dissent, the majority decision is used as evidence, while the majority decision does not consider dissent as evidence under any circumstances.

More information:

link

im gonna take a guess and say gas vans and chambers

it's called a epic poem i believe, hope this ☺