I've been stuck on this question and i need ! in his closing argument during the "mississippi burning" trial, united states vs price et al., prosecutor john doar said to the jury, "members of the jury, this is an important case. it is important to the government. it's important to the defendants, but most important, it's important to the state of mississippi. what i say, what the other lawyers say here today, what the court says about the law will soon be forgotten, but what you twelve people do here today will long be remembered. does not everyone see and understand that it was a matter of absolute necessity that you twelve people of mississippi be asked to sit as jurors and judge this case? these defendants will stand before you on the record in this case and they will beg of you for indulgence. in effect they will beg of you for indulgence. in effect they will say as gloucester said of old as he stood over the body of his slain king, he begged of the queen "say i slew him not." the queen replied then say they were not slain, but they are dead (note: this is a reference to a scene in shakespeare's the life and death of richard the third). if you find that these men or that each of them is not guilty of this conspiracy it would be as true to say that there was no night time release from jail by cecil price, there were no white knights, there are no young men dead, there was no murder. if you find that these men are not guilty you will declare the law of neshoba county to be the law of the state of mississippi." evaluate doar's argument in terms of logos, pathos, and ethos. use evidence from the statement to support your answer. your response should be a minimum of five sentences.

You need to start an experiment and the instructions are to mix 2 g of sodium bicarbonate with 50 ml of distilled water and then mix the solution. describe what lab apparatus you would use and what safety precautions you must observe when completing this experiment.

Read the passage from animal farm. one sunday morning squealer announced that the hens, who had just come in to lay again, must surrender their eggs. napoleon had accepted, through whymper, a contract for four hundred eggs a week. the price of these would pay for enough grain and meal to keep the farm going till summer came on and conditions were easier. when the hens heard this, they raised a terrible outcry. they had been warned earlier that this sacrifice might be necessary, but had not believed that it would really happen. they were just getting their clutches ready for the spring sitting, and they protested that to take the eggs away now was murder. for the first time since the expulsion of jones, there was something resembling a rebellion. led by three young black minorca pullets, the hens made a determined effort to thwart napoleon's wishes. their method was to fly up to the rafters and there lay their eggs, which smashed to pieces on the floor. napoleon acted swiftly and ruthlessly. he ordered the hens' rations to be stopped, and decreed that any animal giving so much as a grain of corn to a hen should be punished by death. the dogs saw to it that these orders were carried out. for five days the hens held out, then they capitulated and went back to their nesting boxes. nine hens had died in the meantime. their bodies were buried in the orchard, and it was given out that they had died of coccidiosis. whymper heard nothing of this affair, and the eggs were duly delivered, a grocer's van driving up to the farm once a week to take them away. which detail from the passage supports the claim that this is an allegory for the great purge? the hens holding out for five days but capitulating the eggs being delivered to the grocer the protesting hens being intentionally starved coccidiosis spreading on the farm

Nthis poem by ruskin bond, what does the use of the word heart-beats suggest about the narrator's attitude toward life?