Read the logical fallacy below and answer the question that follows. baseball players should chew tobacco just like runners drink water during long runs. which answer choice best identifies the logical fallacy in the above statement and explains why the conclusion is false? a. hasty generalization: the statement says that all baseball players chew tobacco just like all runners drink water. b. testimonial: a pro-baseball player endorses the use of chewing tobacco while a marathoner endorses bottled water. c. faulty analogy: this statement compares tobacco to water. whereas runners need to drink water during long runs to keep hydrated, which them continue running, baseball players don’t need to chew tobacco to play a game. d. the statement is not a logical fallacy but a valid conclusion.

When the subject of a sentence performs the action in the sentence the verb in the sentence is in the what ?

Is the sentence the refree blew her whistle and both teams rushed onto the field a coumpound or simple sentence

Julius caesar. [brutus.] with this, she fell distraught, and, her attendants absent, swallowed fire. cassius. and died so? brutus. even so. cassius. o ye immortal gods! [enter lucius, with wine and taper] brutus. speak no more of her. give me a bowl of wine. in this i bury all unkindness, cassius. cassius. my heart is thirsty for that noble pledge. fill, lucius, till the wine o'erswell the cup; i cannot drink too much of brutus' love. [exit lucius. enter titinius, with messala] brutus. come in, titinius; welcome, good messala. now sit we close about this taper here, and call in question our necessities. cassius. portia, art thou gone? brutus. no more, i pray you. what moral dilemma does brutus confront in this excerpt? brutus lets go of his anger toward cassius and forgives him. brutus decides that he will not mourn portia and will stay loyal to cassius. brutus decides that he is too angry at cassius to remain friends with him. brutus questions whether cassius's life should be ended.