Need ( 20 points ) senator warren states that she “honestly can’t believe that we’re still arguing over equal pay in 2014.” is this evidence relevant to support her argument that women should receive equal pay for equal work? a. yes, because warren’s statement emphasizes that wage inequality is unequivocally wrong. b. yes, because warren’s statement convinces us that wage inequality is part of our history. c. no, because warren’s statement shows her outrage but does not explain why she feels that way. d. no, because warren’s statement is specific only to the field of education.

The correct answer is C. No, because Warren's statement shows her outrage but does not explain why she feels that way.

Explanation:

An argument is usually a claim that expresses a position about some issue or subject, due to this, arguments support specific ideas, additionally, for an argument to be strong and defend appropriately a position it is required to use further information, examples, statistical data, among others that work as evidence by showing the argument is valid, not only because someone believes it, but because there is other information that supports that idea. In the case of Senator Warren's words there is no evidence but only a statement that shows she is upset about the equal pay, in this way, this information is not relevant to support her argument as it does not prove anything but only shows her feeling about one issue but no explanation or evidence is provided.

the answer is not b, and i don't think its a, so i choose either man's identity is found within the traditions of his ancestors   or language is a powerful tool, tell me if i was wrong or right by the way

argumentative i feel like this best match it but it could judgmental to