Which of the following most precisely explains the importance of understanding the historical context of a piece of literature? a. knowing the time period of a piece of literature allows the reader a greater understanding of the themes and concerns of the work. b. understanding the historical context of literature the reader figure out vocabulary words he or she doesn't know. c. understanding the historical context of literature the reader understand the characters' names. d. the historical context is important only for literature that is written by today's authors.

Question serial number: 1162965720-nccj84question category: the title as the main idea 2**it is important to learn about finances. take, for instance, the old rule of saving ten percent of every paycheck. are most people aware that theyshould immediately take that percentage out of their paycheck and put it into savings? balancing your checkbook is another important element ofganar your money. buy a money tracking program and use it to manage your money. another important tip is to speak with a financialplaner and learn about stocks and bonds. come up with a savings plan that includes a 401k, stocks, and bonds. and start young the longer youwait to save, the less compound interest you will accumulate.which is the best title for this paragraph?

In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.

Me plz why do tourists have to view stonehenge from a distance? a. the stones could fall and injure someone.b. visitors have caused too much damage.c. visitors get in the way of scientists.