Read the excerpts from queen elizabeth's speeches. which best describes a difference in the types of rhetorical appeals used by queen elizabeth in these excerpts from her address to the troops at tilbury and response to parliament's request that she marry? when speaking to her troops, queen elizabeth appeals to logos to convince the troops of her capabilities as a leader. when speaking to parliament, queen elizabeth appeals to pathos to make members feel ashamed of their request. when speaking to her troops, queen elizabeth appeals to pathos to convince the troops of her capabilities as a leader. when speaking to parliament, queen elizabeth appeals to logos to make members feel ashamed of their request. when speaking to her troops, queen elizabeth appeals to logos to inspire and encourage her army. when speaking to parliament, queen elizabeth appeals to pathos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers. when speaking to her troops, queen elizabeth appeals to pathos to inspire and encourage her army. when speaking to parliament, queen elizabeth appeals to logos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers. mark this and return

When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to inspire and encourage her army. When speaking to Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers.

Explanation:

The use of pathos in the speech to the troops was intended to create an emotional argument. Arguments of this nature may aim at common feeling, shared cultural values, or be structured to manipulate and elicit a direct emotional response. The person making the argument tries to make the listener identify with it. with that, the queen sought to inspire and encourage the soldiers of her army.

On the other hand, in her discourse to parliament, the queen must use rational and logical arguments to convert the legislators, so she appealed to the logos.  The feature for logos is a logical argument. The credibility of the argument rests on its coherence and internal structure, as well as the evidence presented in its support.

thats harsh

explanation:

i believe the answer is: b. mr. head had a long, tube-like face with a rounded open jaw and a short depressed nose.

this is because in the un-revised sentence it said that mr. heads face was long and tube-like, and he had a rounded open jaw. this is not a very grammatically correct because of how it seems to drag on with the and, replaced with, with, makes it sound more fluent in the description.