Read the excerpt from ronald reagan’s address at moscow state university. (freedom, it has been said, makes people selfish and materialistic,) but americans are one of the most religious peoples on earth. because they know that liberty, just as life itself, is not earned but a gift from god, they seek to share that gift with the world. "reason and experience," said george washington in his farewell address, "both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. and it is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government." check all that apply. the (underlined) words in this excerpt are (parenthesis are the underlinded words) a) an example of procatalepsis. b) an example of allusion. c) used by reagan to acknowledge an opposing view. d) included by reagan to discourage increased freedom. e) followed by a counterargument proving reagan’s point.

The CORRECT answers are A,C,E

A) an example of procatalepsis.

C) used by Reagan to acknowledge an opposing view.

E) followed by a counterargument proving Reagan’s point.

The correct answers are A, C and E.

In this excerpt from Ronald Reagan’s "Address at Moscodnw State University", the underlined words are:

A- An example of procatalepsis becuase by saying this, Reagan is raising an objection to his own argument and then, in the following part, answering it.

C- A way to acknowledge an opposing view to the one he is presenting. The underline words do not represent Raegan's position on the subject, but he still acknowledges them.

E- Followed by a counterargument. Raegan uses this phrase to emphasize his own point of view and position by contrasting each other.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this