Is climate change a catastrophe that warrants immediate action? " a yes or no answer will not suffice! find an article in the popular media. that addresses the "costs" of global warming, whether through the costs of action (e. g., to institute a mitigation measure or regulation) or the costs of inaction (e. g., coastal flooding, soil salinization). these costs may be related to human health, biodiversity, the economy, damages to infrastructure, or some other relevant concern.

Climate change as catastrophic, irreversible this article is taken from Guardian newspaper.

Explanation:

As global warming is a long rise in the average temperatures of the earth climate it's a major aspect o climate change taking place all over the world. And it is measured by the rise in rising in surface temperature both on land and in oceans and measured continuously as its growth is continuous. According to the IPCC panel the the global rise in temperature form 2.8 degree to 4.8 degrees in 21st century and the possible costs associated to this event site migration of species from these place, along with the environmental impact of mass extinction or relocation natural ecosystems such as coral reefs, mountain chains and shrinking of arctic and antarctic poles. Various NGOs have come up that try to mitigate this change in the evolution of natural gases, either by climatic engineering or by adaptation of habitats. NASA, UNFCCC and G77 nations have taken this step towards the prevention of climatic change.

Largely uneconomic because they provide little profit or food surplusi think so