Tudy the graph showing GDP in the US. A line graph titled G D P Growth in the U S. The x-axis is labeled Year from 2004 to 2014. The y-axis is labeled Percent Growth from negative 4 to 6. 2004 is at 4 percent. 2006 is around 3 percent. 2007 is at 2 percent. 2009 is under negative 2 percent. 2010 is at 2 percent. 2012 is at 2 percent. 2014 is over 2 percent.

What conclusion can be drawn about the US economy as a whole between 2006 and 2009?

It remained level.
It declined steadily.
It wavered in growth.
It rose from a downturn.

since there isn't any suggested answers i will give you the reason and hopefully you can figure it

south africa, or rather all of africa, has not been in the location in which it is nowadays throughout the geological past. after the super-continent pangaea started to break apart, gondwanaland, in which was africa, moved further south, and parts of it came to be very close to the south pole. because the climate in this part of the world is very cold due to the very dispersed sun rays in there, what is now south africa, started to freeze, and the conditions were right for the formation of glaciers. the glaciers existed up until the period when gondwanaland started to break apart and what is now africa started to move towards north, sp it warmed up and the glaciers melted.

hey there!

the correct answer is b

i wish you the best of luck and have a fantastic (: