Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid? why or why not? who do you think is the most important person in the courtroom during a trial? explain.

I believe that expert witnesses should not be paid. The main reason for this is the fact that being paid for a testimony can be considered, in some cases, to establish a responsibility towards the person who is paying for the services. This can make the expert act in a biased or less objective way, which defeats the purpose of his work.

The most important person in the courtroom during a trial is the person who is on trial. The defendant is the reason why the trial is taking place, and why the rest of the people have gathered in the courtroom. Moreover, the defendant is the person who would be most affected by the outcome of the trial.

81 is a composite number.

since there isn't any suggested answers i will give you the reason and hopefully you can figure it

south africa, or rather all of africa, has not been in the location in which it is nowadays throughout the geological past. after the super-continent pangaea started to break apart, gondwanaland, in which was africa, moved further south, and parts of it came to be very close to the south pole. because the climate in this part of the world is very cold due to the very dispersed sun rays in there, what is now south africa, started to freeze, and the conditions were right for the formation of glaciers. the glaciers existed up until the period when gondwanaland started to break apart and what is now africa started to move towards north, sp it warmed up and the glaciers melted.