What interesting patterns did you notice between the various stakeholders in relation to the arguments for and against the Keystone XL Pipeline?

Hello. You did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it difficult for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

Keystone XL Pipeline was a pipeline installation project that originated in Canada but extended to the US. The installation of this pipeline was very controversial and spurred people against and in favor of the installation. It was normal that both the people who were against and those who were in favor presented opinion patterns that are opinions that are repeated in each group.

In the group in favor of installing the pipeline, we could see a pattern where people argued that this pipeline would create many jobs, improve countries' economies, and increase the flow of energy and oil in North America. In the group against installation, we could see a pattern, where people claimed that the installation of this pipeline would negatively impact nature and encourage the use of fossil fuels that would stimulate global warming.

7.03-1.70=5.33 and 6.80+5.09=11.89 and 5.5-3.01=2.49