Why might it be beneficial to regulate what species of plants and animals people are allowed to own in particular environments? a. Some species might become invasive and destructive if they escaped. B. Some species may be dangerous to humans. C. Nonnative plants and animals should only be used for commercial purposes. D. There is no reason to restrict an individuals’ right to own plants or animals. Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D.

Mexico has a host of environmental problems, including significant chemicalpollution  from factory discharges and waste dumping, but the main threat to itsbiodiversity  probably stems from  deforestation  and other natural habitat losses. forest habitat is lost for a number of reasons

There is no map, maybe give the link, it may be b

The latin america and caribbean (lac) region encompasses countries with great environmental issues. the southern portion of central america to the caribbean's part, including south america presses the major environmental issues like deforestation and   habitat subsistence. the requirement of the whole country and the pressure of export is being done by this region as it possess the soil with highest fertility rate and maximum strength which could us in modifying the various technology for the humankind. because of deforestation, we take animal shelters away from them, so the major issue occurs again which we known as "habitat subsistence". government has to set the target according to the capacity of a certain region which would not affect the environment. then, businesses and organizations have to understand their roles and need to divide the task into several groups (one for each, according to their natural capacity), individuals can the government or statuary body by just following their guidelines and never harm or exploit the environment for our own use.i really hope this you out!

Where is the map from the question?